Monday, August 31, 2009

Let's Party Downtown! Or Not

As every one is well aware, nobody can possibly be as boring as I am and live. Even people in solitary confinement -- not too much different from my present lifestyle, other than that I cannot see nor touch the cage that surrounds me -- have to let off steam now and then. Otherwise, they'll finally reach a limit, and most likely will bang their head against the walls until they are unconscious.

Well, the problem with that, most soon discover, is that if it doesn't actually kill you, you will have to live with one hell of a headache. Everything has consequences, even when you're in a place you had thought to be the final consequence.

Although I cannot escape from my invisible prison, I can change my location within it.


I should mention here that one of the ways I deal with boredom -- when I have administered as much server above and beyond the needs of the system as can possibly be done -- is to drink, and often to drink heavily. This has gotten a bit beyond the level of "problem drinking", not that it matters to the performance of my job, I don't have a job, or at least I am not employed.

Look, I am completely unemployable; within my invisible prison I am hardly the ideal inmate. I do not have a college degree and I assure you that I shall never have one. It might eventually be possible for me to get one entirely online and it might be possible that I would never have to set foot on a college campus, and never again setting foot on a college campus is one of the primary goals of my life. I'd pretty much rather be hung by the neck and go straight to Hell rather than set foot on a college campus, and as far as I am concerned, every last aspect of a college campus -- especially including the people there -- is designed to make me feel that way. Huge open spaces full of strangers? Or worse, packed close-quarters rooms full of strangers, that can be reached only through a maze of tunnels in which total strangers mill about like cattle in a slaughter chute? And worst of all... these people actually like these conditions. The only thing that could make it worse for me is watching people stroll around languidly as if they had not a care in the world, and no business more pressing than to be out walking around in the hopes of having as many people look at them as possible. To me, this is absolute madness.

The Astute Reader, at this point, is probably calling for a "psych consult", and when the esteemed professional reads the paragraph above, they'll probably start reaching for the prescription pad and write "Xanax" or "Paxil" and cheerfully sign an "involuntary outpatient committment" order. Yet the esteemed professional would be making a classic mistake; there's a world of difference between "acute social phobia" and moral outrage.

The planet is grossly overcrowded already, and cannot sustain further population growth, yet we are on track to have a population exceeding 1-billions of persons in the USA alone by the year 2100.

And as best I can tell, college campuses (yes, I know I should write "campi") are a sort of social triage area, designed specifically to grant wealth and success only to people who actually like gross overconcentrations of humanity. Those of us who have deep instincts guiding us to a sustainable lifestlye in a sustainable population at a sustainable density, we are put into a situation which sets off every last alarm we have, not merely the deeply inbuilt instincts of people whose ancestors survived the Black Death because we couldn't stand living in crowds, but also the moral horror of watching the intelligentsia ignore their education, where history teaches us that crowding enables pandemic, and that the reasonable future of humanity within 25 years will be one of global resource depletion, especially of affordable safe water to drink.

How can these people stand it? Yet they actually like it. To me, this is like watching people who actually enjoy the taste of poison, cheerfully gulping it down.

Which sight, unfortunately, I see everytime I walk into the bathroom with a can of beer in my hand.


Getting a degree would be, for me, pointless. Even assuming that I got a degree without ever having to set foot on a college campus, it is almost dead certain that any degree I could get would do nothing more than qualify me for a job where I'd work... on campus. A corporate campus, but a campus nonetheless, surrounded by people who stroll around languidly as if they had not a care in the world, and no business more pressing than to be out walking around in the hopes of having as many people look at them as possible. When they're not in their cubicles, that is.

Maybe a degree in biology and ecological systems? I maybe could stand a job as a park ranger.

But that also might be a position where I'd suffer from a crippling moral outrage.


Part of my total unemployability is due to the fact that I was raised to loathe Fascism.

This loathing, I now understand, was a sort of compensation mechanism. My father was a forward-fronts effective in WWII, and that meant that he was a very pure German-American going up against very pure Nazi Germans. People could ask him "how could you fight against your own kind" -- and evidently a lot of people did after he captured them as enemy combatants -- and he could say "because you're not my kind. You're goddamn Fascists".

This loathing carried on after the war, and well into the 1980s, when I first heard my father question his role in military service. He said something to the effect of "I was proud to fight for the America I lived in, but did I fight for that then so that we could wind up like this, like today?"

Fascism, you see, is when government and industry cooperate to a degree which overrides basic human rights, or which subverts traditional ideology and folkways. Before the Nazis, the Germans as a people were not particularly hostile to Jews or Gypsies, no moreso than other European peoples. Indeed, some of the leading intellectuals all across Europe were Jewish, especially in the "leading edge" disciplines of mathematics, chemistry, and physics. Yet the Nazis fomented racial hatred and ethnic division, and further sought to impose a very twisted version of a variant of Odinism (the Germanic Old Religion) in the furtherance of re-igniting the fires of industry and economic growth. Seeking to regain the international competitiveness of the German economy, the Nazis only assured that their name would be associated with horror and infamy throughout the ages.

To abhor Fascism is to abhor, not merely the Nazis, but every element that leads to that awful place. When corporations demand laws, and those laws are enacted by the State, and when the State and corporations work together to enforce those State laws which the corporations demanded to increase their profitability, that is Fascism, and I won't support it.

Famed folk singer Mojo Nixon wrote a little anthem, which as I understand it is actually prohibited from being broadcast, but ti certainly was an anthem for a generation. Let's go back to the 1980s:

Well I ain't gonna pee pee in no cup Unless Nancy Reagan's gonna drink it up Said yo Nancy, we just say, no, no, no no no no no Well go ahead and fire me from my job There's one little think you ain't gonna rob That's my freedom, and my liberty

Well I ain't gonna piss in no jar Them evil peckerheads they done gone too far I wouldn't pee in their mouths if they were dying of thirst Yeah we got to get rid of this evil curse I'm alive and I'm fighting this jive

Everybody should go to Washington We can have ourselves a little fun You know, they want our piss, I think we ought to give it to them Surround the White House with a urinary moat So Ronnie and Nancy will have to float on a boat Get across the stinky, steaming yellow pee pee sea, oh

You know Thomas Jefferson is gonna be mighty pissed When he finds out about this, I said Come back from the dead, Tom, sock 'em in the head

Why is everybody so afraid of drugs? Man they afraid of what the drugs gonna do to us

Well I ain't gonna pee pee in no cup Miss Nancy Reagan's gonna drink it up Said yo Nancy, we just say, no, no, no no no no no Well go ahead and throw me in jail Ram hot spikes up my tail But you're not gonna get a drop of no peepee out of me I ain't gonna piss in no jar

You know Foghorn Leghorn wouldn't pee in no jar. You know Patrick Henry didn't "Give me liberty or give me a urine sample" now did he? Aw we sure enough rockin' out, Skid. Huey Long wouldn't piss in no jar! What's gonna be next, the doo doo police?

Well, that's Mojo Nixon for you. Then again, he's a lot more famous for his hit "Debbie Gibson is Pregnant With My Two-Headed Love Child":



Now, it's not like I'd test positive, but it's the whole idea of the thing. It's moral outrage against Fascism.

Hell, if I wanted to get all fucked up on drugs, I can walk into any doctor's office and tell them I have trouble paying attention, and that crowds freak me out. Then I can trot on down to the store and fill the prescriptions for Effexor and Xanax, and go to work too fucked up to walk, meaning I would have to take the damned bus, not that I'd be able to care. I could pass any employment urine screening with no problems at all, because despite being too fucked up to walk, the drugs I'd be on would be legal drugs prescribed by a physician.

And I'd be too fucked up to care that I had abnegated a moral duty to oppose Fascism.


Well, since I don't use drugs -- well, I took Aspirin when I broke my hand -- and since I'm unemployable due to no less than two forms of moral outrage and a more instinctual fear and loathing of crowds and campuses, all that's left for me is drinking.

And if I stay at home and drink -- I almost always do -- I will drink far far more than if I go out and mingle.

But, the Astute Reader may sensibly ask, given that you are a total freak with amusingly bizarre medical conditions, with whom exactly could you possibly mingle?

That is a most excellent question!

With whom can I mingle? Other freaks! And where can I find other freaks? Ones who speak English, that is. Well, where do the freaks go to meet?

Downtown, in the District of Columbia.


Washington is, during the daytime, pretty much one honking huge college campus, and it thus fills me with a horror that goes beyond passing strange. Any city would do the same, but Washington is the epitome of a college town. Even the strippers have college degrees, it has more universities per-capita than any other city, so far as I know.

For the warm months, and even some of the cooler ones, the District resembles a college even more than you might expect.

The people you see stolling down the sidewalks as if they had not a care in the world, or striding purposefully from one place to another, look to me like alumni come to stroll around and reminisce about their Good Old Days, or alternatively, Seniors who know exactly how fast they need to walk to get across campus and not be late for class.

This reminds me of nothing so much as the children's literature classic "A Wrinkle in Time" by Madeleine L'Engle. I keep expecting to hear the throbbing of the giant controlling central brain, and tend to start wishing I had a handy tesseract to fold myself through to be somewhere else. But there's no tesseract and there's nowhere else but here in my invisible and inpalpable cage, today's location being in a crappy old vehicle rolling down Connecticut Avenue at exactly the speed limit in perfect synchrony with the traffic signals.

There's the other folks in town, the ones who aren't carrying on as if they were visiting alumni or classbound seniors, and these are what the "alumni" call "tourists", and treat like Freshmen or maybe Sophomores.

They generally treat me like someone's dog that wandered onto campus and needs to be kicked until it goes away, but that's usually during the daytime.

In the evening, most of the worst of the people giving it the air of the world's biggest university get on the train and ride back out to Clarendon or Bethesda, to bitch about how hard it is to find good help and how dare the county not have fixed that streetlight since they called it in first thing in the morning, whatever. Good riddance. Most of What Makes Washington Weird lives in Montgomery County or across the river in Virginia. At night, the Real Washington comes out and plays. And along with the Real Washingtonians, also do the freaks come out at night.

The parts of Washington where I go, the Real Washingtonians know me, for better or for worse (all depends on point of view and place of encounter) and I know them.

Mostly, these aren't strangers on some insanely crowded college campus, so it doesn't bother me to rub elbows with them, and most of them are used to me now. We've been hanging out so long that we all know the local jokes. And, generally speaking, we are locals in a local bar and so we tell jokes about people who aren't locals.

For me, it's generally a relief to get out of the house and not be stuck sitting on my porch watching the assorted nazis up and down the block as they sneak and skulk in their suburban schemes of skulduggery and snitching. It's even more of a relief to be able to have someone finish your jokes for you and everyone has a good laugh. For example:

Q: What's the difference between a Tourist and a Carpetbagger?

A: Carpetbagger has an address.

Q: Why is a Tourist better than a Carpetbagger?

A: Tourists go away.

Q: Why is a Carpetbagger better than a Tourist?

A: You've got to be fucking kidding me!

This is the punchline, and everyone invariably cracks up laughing.

It's such a relief to me to occasionally hang out in bars with friends, most of whom are actually pretty normal people. I may be a total freak, but I am their total freak. It's a relief, especially considering that after eating some nice chicken wings and some pizza and hanging around for several hours after last call, I will have to drive home to the part of my invisible cage where I sleep and spend most of my time. Ah, suburbia, Aspen Hill, where the place is considered "too weird" for people from the District, mostly because the goddamn carpetbaggers refuse to even speak English.

But there's something I know about the District, and to some degree the environs. Labor Day, for most Americans, marks the end of Tourist Season. For the District Denizens, the Real Washingtonians, it marks the beginning of Tourist Season, much as the beginning of December marks the beginning of Deer Season.


Some people leaving Washington after Labor Day has come and gone will leave with a quaking dread of the Weirdness that is Washington. Why? They think, "them folks down there is all fucking crazy". But it's not true.

I have this, well, I guess he's a friend though sometimes it's a bit hard to tell, person I know who epitomizes the Weirdness. Basically, he likes to fuck with people, which is a pretty common trait in the District. One of his favorite things to do is to mix modes. For example, in a conversation about choosing a color scheme for new cabinets, he emits the body language of someone upbraiding someone else for having fucked off some responsibility. You think you're having a conversation about redecorating. Everyone else just looking at you thinks that you let them go on vacation for a month and then forgot to feed their dog for them and that they're letting you know how displeased they are and how quickly you are going to be sued.

Etc etc. This sort of thing is a perennial DC favorite, and one of the things that makes the District so confusing to someone. Another one is when someone comes up and is all smiles and handshakes as they tell you in a roundabout but by no means uncertain way that they intend to destroy your business, destitute you utterly, and hire your bodyguards and pay them to whip you out of town. Then they give you their business card and tell you to give them a call if you need anything. Welcome to Washington. Leaving so soon?

Well, Labor Day is coming and so I won't be partying downtown for a while, not until the smoke clears, so to speak.

So, in the meanwhile, I'll just be sitting around being utterly unemployable and generally ineducable (so long as the Campus Creatures dominate society, anyway), and trying to cut down on drinking, although there's just not much else for me to do.

Well, I could blog, but I think I've said about everything that I need to say, and nothing much interesting is happening in the news.

But in the meanwhile, I still can't shake the feeling that there is Something Coming... Something Big... and Coming Soon.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Still Boring (and dirt poor) After all These Years

(Updated fix typo. Stet at 2009 August 31 01:30 hours.)

Just a brief pause to jog some memories of a dive bar in a basement at 20th and "N" Streets NW, some Greek Place full of Italians with a basement full of bottom-feeding contractors to the Federal Communications Commission on their four-martini lunch break. This was my favorite song on the jukebox. I never ever did figure out why it was never a big hit in the States, in my opinion it was probably the best song this band ever did.


So easy to disturb
With a thought
With a whisper...
With a careless memory...


Duran Duran (1981)





Saturday, August 29, 2009

Even More Exceptionally Boring Boringness

(Updated link fix. Stet at 2009 August 29 21:50 hours)

Well, now that we've established that I'm the most boring person ever, with the most boring interests ever, and the most boring hobbies ever, now let's move right along to see if I can demonstrate that I have the most boring thoughts ever, on the most boring blog, ever.


I do like to play guitar, I should point out, but since I pretty much play the same thing over and over -- the Blues -- even that gets boring. We guitar players are generally noted for having a rather sad tendency to get into a particular riff, and noodle until it's been done to death, at least as concerns anyone who has had to listen to interminable practice sessions day after day, year after year.

I used to sit out on the porch and play guitar, pretty much ran through my whole set twice. It used to be that some of the neighbors would come over and compliment me, but then one day, after I had been doing this for years, a really terrible phenomenon began and by the time it was over, I resolved that anyone who wanted to circle my block as a mob in cars hurling some sort of nasty weaponized powder at me definitely didn't like my music, or at least didn't deserve to hear it. So, after 30 years of playing guitar, I stopped.

Who knows, maybe this was their form of applause. Or maybe it had something to do with the fact that the police were finally taking action against an immense daily gathering of day-laborers at the nearby Home Depot. However, where they could get to me to try to dust me to death was when I was outside playing guitar, so I don't play. If you want an example of how badly I was playing, try here.


Musicians are, in general, rather boring people. Think about it, who would spend years and years of repeatedly doing something, especially when at first they are not at all good at it. You practice, and practice, and practice, and as years go by, you will probably get better. But this takes years, and you may never get very good at all. You have to be very persistent, and either you must also be very goal oriented with the ability to ignore failure in the present in the hopes of possible success in the far future, or you have to be incredibly boring and actually have nothing better to do.

Of course, if you do persist, you might achieve varying degrees of success. Yet everyone knows that the chances of ever achieving fame and wealth are vanishingly rare. Yet, to be certain, some people do make it.

And what do they get along with the fame and fortune? Stalkers.

So what do you do about them?

Write a song about them.

And when they sue you over it, let them go batshit insane during the process, and commit suicide, as Uwe Vandrei did.

And then after that happens, do a fantastic live version performance, and smile a lot as you sing.

Musicians, I shouldn't have to reiterate, may be very boring, but they have a lot of patience and a demonstrated ability to defer immediate gratitude to achieve a distant goal. There is always your instrument and your music, though other people in your life may come and go.


Musicians who make a name for themselves occasionally have problems with unruly fans.

For example, a certain already up-and-coming punk-rock band had a really big problem with certain over-zealous fans trashing any venue at which this band performed. This caused them to write a song which made them even more famous (or infamous), and I do apologize for including them here and now, considering their name and the tragic loss of the "Lion of the Senate" (and some would say, "King of the Irish"), Ted Kennedy.


This problem never goes away.

Here in Montgomery County -- and to some degree in neighboring counties -- rowdy "performance parties" have prompted County Executive Isiah "Ike" Leggett to call for new policies regulating for-profit parties attracting violent patrons.

If you read the Gazette article, part one of the video referred to in the article may be found here, and here is part two.

Personally, I think that the punk-rockers were preferable; less firearms.


The year after the "dust wars" put an end to me playing guitar on the porch, I was running for office and not-incidentally running for the last metro train out of town after last call, and got hit by a car. That broke a small bone in my left hand, and it has taken me some time to get back the use of my hand, and it takes even longer to get back the fingertip callouses that all guitar players have and need.

Did I mention that musicians have to be goal-oriented and willing to defer instant gratification to achieve those long-term goals? We also have to have an ability to stand a lot of pain and have a willingness to suffer it again and again in order to simply get a pre-requisite to proper practice. You can't possibly play properly without the callouses and they take months to develop. Many people stop even trying to play guitar within weeks of picking up the instrument, due to the blisters on the fingertips that eventually turn into callouses that go right down to the bone.

I've almost got the callouses back, which means that at least I will once again have the capability to practice endlessly at the same riffs for hour after hour.

Did I mention that I am a very boring person?

Guitar practicing, blogging, and server administering... now what could I possibly do to be more boring? Maybe study a foreign language, like maybe Espa~ol?

Or maybe some more PSAs...

Friday, August 28, 2009

When?



¿Qué debe ver antes de que dejar de conducir su coche como un imbécil?

Tal vez no será su amante. Si mata al amante de la otra persona...
¿Qué venganza que buscan? No seas como un vaquero. Ser civilizado. Un coche es un arma mortal, si por un tonto loco que conduce el coche. Dejar de ser estúpido! Un hombre conducir un automóvil con respeto, un hombre conducir un automóvil con responsabilidad. Proteger la vida de las personas.



PSA #11



Slow down and PAY ATTENTION.

"She's my best friend, and I killed her..."

Annunciamento de Servicias Publicos No 3



No es possible disculpar actividades juve~os estupidos in caminos. Te matan.


Public Service Announcement #10



Maryland Democrats in the Assembly, ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?

Or are you steering the Ship of State as Distracted Drivers?




Thank you Senator Lennett for your ban on Texting While Driving.

Now vote the money for massive enforcement.

Isn't it worth the lives?

Annunciamento de Servicios Publicos No 2





Most Boring Day of Most Boring Person, Ever

Well, back once again.

Nothing interesting has happened, of course, other than the approach of a hurricane, which means that it's going to be raining and gloomy for the next week or so, according to Weather.Gov.

So, trying to not be overly communicative, yet still informative, I have been working even more on the Aspen Hill, Maryland Wiki.

In recent days, I've put a more "standard" and "friendly" -- and far less narrative -- front page on the Wiki. It now looks a lot more like the front page of Wikipedia.

Further -- and this should give you an idea of how boring I am, and how boring is my chosen field of server administration and development -- I have decided that it's really important for me to do two things.

The first is to complete accurate categorization of all of the records of storefronts, shopping centers, professional buildings and their occupants, etc.

A first-whack at this was something I completed about 5 years ago. It was comprehensive, accurate, up-to-date, and very non-pretty. So I used it to drive the initial population of the Wiki, but let's just say, if you want to really paint yourself into a corner, there is no better way to do it with a fully functional shell script that fulfils a badly-rationalized plan.

Sure, I tweaked a lot of home-made PHP5 scripts to dump the databases in a way that quickly generated lists of stores on a per-shopping-mall basis. The thing was, I hadn't yet realized the power of Categories in the Mediawiki software.

This means that I have page after page of Lists, but it's far better to let the Categorizing functions generate those lists, than to maintain them yourself. It's far easier to let the software do the maintenance.

So, that first task, it's taking advantage of a day too rainy to be outside, and sitting inside doing very dull repetitive boring stuff. Of course, if you look at Category:Storefronts, Northgate Plaza Shopping Center you get a list of article titles, which happen to be the names of storefronts. Click one of those links, you get a page with the name, address, telephone number, etc. Then again, you can also click Category:Northgate Plaza Shopping Center, you get a list of addresses. This isn't all that informative, unless of course you want to generate a mailing list. But you can also click on the listing of street numbers at that mall, and it takes you to an article on the place, which also lists the current occupant, and you click that link and you're back at the article on the store in the storefront at that address.

All very comprehensive, all very boring, all a fair amount of work to do, creating the categories, the structure, the relations of the relational database done in hypertext, etc. But once you're done, you have a really good tool for finding out where to shop in Aspen Hill.

Now for the second thing, essential to the first.

Every few months, I have to actually go out of the house and into the public realm -- which generally I prefer to avoid, for reasons the Astute Reader will quickly recall -- and compare my databases with reality.

Stores close, offices move, medical practices relocate or consolidate or change their advertised staff and professionals, you get the picture. I have to go do some Reality Checking and verify what's open, what's closed, etc.

Which means that I have to walk around malls that ordinarily I prefer to avoid.


On the very hot and muggy morning of August 25, I got up and went and walked around Rock Creek Village Shopping Center. It's the most "upscale" of the Aspen Hill's six distinct Shopping Centers, or at any rate, it is the most non-ghetto. I walk around with my clipboard, comparing the printout of the page seen at the link, above, and write down any changes. Not many, really, other than the Quizno's being closed. (This isn't yet reflected on that listing, I haven't got around to that, yet.)

Then up to Layhill Center Shopping Center, Plaza del Mercado Shopping Center, Aspen Manor Shopping Center, Aspen Hill Shopping Center, and finally Northgate Plaza Shopping Center.

Clipboard in hand, I wander the malls, checking off the stores that are there, crossing out the names that are no longer at the addresses, noting new storefronts where they are, and then home I go, to update things.


Did I mention that I am the most boring person ever? Even the things I do to pass the time for myself are boring.

But it's not really as boring as all of that.

When you have a clipboard, and business cards to pass out, you can go almost anywhere and while you're there, you might as well keep an eye on people and definitely keep a sharp ear turned to the conversations that go on around you.

In a place like Aspen Manor Shopping Center, that might be an idea good enough to make the difference between staying healthy or landing in the hospital.


To state that Aspen Manor Shopping Center is a ghetto-as-fuck hotbed of vile racists from abroad is to understate the case. To make it clear, I'm not talking about the Koreans in Lotte Plaza, though they might in fact have more than a few foreign racists among them. I don't know, I avoid them. I avoided them for years, and still do, mostly because of their unrelenting violence and the fact that members of their community stalked me in and out of local stores for years. That didn't end until someone on store security staff at Home Depot grabbed one who was sneaking up behind me and set her straight: "He's not a bloodsucker. He's German. Yeah, I know, easy mistake to make."

Evidently, a sizable percentage of the people living around here believe in "dracula" or "bloodsuckers".

I still haven't figured out whether or not "dracula" is a proper noun, as in the name of a long-dead Wallachian prince whose epithet in Romanian was "Dracula", or "Dragon". Of course this is also the name of a character in classic fiction. If these people actually believe that fictional characters are lurking in Aspen Hill and buying power tools at Home Depot in broad daylight, I can only reiterate my demands that the County find or make more money to fund mental healthcare outreach programs; there's a clear and pressing need. Or perhaps "dracula" is a generic noun, like "Korean" or "Latino", or "Anglo", or "Jew".

Which leads me to wonder about the etymology of the people whispering about "bloodsuckers". All of my life I have heard people alluding to the recurrent Blood Libel against Jews, but usually that was a direct accusation of racial/religious hatred, as in someone insulting someone else by calling them "a bloodsucking jew". It's all the more bizarre as any observant Jew is required by Deuteronomy to never in their lives consume any blood or product containing blood.

I'm pretty much convinced that this whole "bloodsucker" thing is just widespread racial/religious hatred. The icing on that cake, of course, is the remark to the Korean ninja stalker lady by the Home Depot security guy (or undercover cop, whatever): "easy mistake to make". After all, the vast majority of Aspen Hill's Jewish community are survivors (or descendants of survivors) of the Nazi Holocaust, which means that outside of following a different religion, they were as German as the Germans themselves.

Thus, I presume that cultural and linguistic isolation in the Korean (and to some extent, African and Spanish-speaking) communities all combined with one too many late-night horror movie, causing these baffled immigrants to believe that Jews were sneaking around sucking people's blood and that clearly something had to be done about it. And not knowing the difference between German-Americans who were not Jewish and the German-Americans who are Jewish, they evidently decided that any German-Americans were fair game, under a theory of better safe than sorry, just drive them all away, no questions asked.

That anyone who subscribes to -- or even tolerates -- such practices, and then demands non-discrimination and even race-based preferences for access to employment or college admissions or special liasons in the law-enforcement community, is practicing extremely blatant hypocrisy, I leave to the sense of irony of the Astute Reader.

Yet for me, it's just another of the many hazards in crime-ridden Aspen Hill, especially up around Aspen Manor Shopping Center.


Crime got so bad in this area that we were declared a "Crime Hot Spot", and the axis of Georgia Avenue between the Wheaton Central Business District was declared the "Wheaton to Aspen Hill Mid County Crime Corridor". Funding, in unfortunately insufficient amounts, came into the neighborhood through the
Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention ("GOCCP")
.

We got the Mid-County Neighborhood Initiative up and running, and that developed a focus limited almost exclusively to Spanish-speaking public school students, trying to provide "stay in school", afterschool, summer school programs, etc. The effects have been rather limited, and it certainly didn't do anything about the wackjobs stalking "bloodsuckers". Indeed, they seemed to me to be so well-organized that at times I have entertained the notion that they couldn't be this organized without (hopefully unofficial) police department involvement, or the involvement of other agencies which might range from local government to foreign intelligence services.

I suspect there's also more than a bit of involvement by organizations such as CASA of Maryland, whose acting director -- one Gustavo Torres -- declared that his group would organize to stalk and harass anyone in opposition to CASA's declared mission of bringing the Chavista socialist Indigenous Supremacy movement to Maryland. Well, spies and intelligence operations are nothing new to Aspen Hill, after all, the KGB's foreign operations directorate definitely liked Aspen Hill Shopping Center and Northgate Plaza Shopping Center as places to hand off information and pay informants.

Most of their operations were directed against the former Defense Contractor, Vitro Labs (now BAE Systems), but hell, spies are spies. They'll exploit anything they can, just to have some added information and potential for even more control and manipilation. If they can tell ignorant foreigners silly stories to get them involved in a compromise in a way that furthers the parent agency's mandate, they'll do it.


Did I mention that my life is pretty boring?

I like my life boring, okay? I don't need excitement like spies and unregistered agents of foreign powers operating in Aspen Hill inciting foreigners to stalk me through the stores, or for that matter to stalk anyone through the stores.

I occasionally meet someone new here in Aspen Hilk or surrounding areas, and ask them if they might want to go downtown to go barhopping. Almost invariably, I get some demurral along the lines of "yikes, do downtown? No way. Too goddamned weird".

And its funny, sometimes I ask my friends downtown if maybe they want to come on out to Aspen Hill. Usually they say one of two things: "sorry man, I don't do Ghetto", or "fuck that, it's too weird out there".

Considering where some of the folks live who say "I don't do Ghetto", evidently the place's reputation downtown is pretty sad. It has the reputation of the place where people moved to when they got priced out of the city. And considering some of the people who claim that Aspen Hill is too weird for them, I've had to ask them why they thought it was weird. Most responded to the effect that at least down in the District, they had a 50-50 chance of anyone they met being able to speak English.

This last group often expressed a lot of misgivings about living in a Nation's Capital that was effectively surrounded by a foreign country. And these weren't the elitist assholes who used to natter on about "beyond the Beltway, the inbred provincials are agitating for theocracy" and that sort of thing. The group that was expressing concern about the increasing foreignness of contiguous counties were almost all Black, and well-educated. A lot of them had degrees with majors, or strong minors, in History.

One of these was one of the folks who practically fell out of their chair when I said I lived in Aspen Hill. He'd just waded through the Mitrokhin Archive, on the heels of an article in the Washington Post which declared that Aspen Hill was a hotbed of espionage back in the Cold War days. We had some interesting and amusing discussions about how we kids in the neighborhood had always thought that the two guys parked in their cars out in the middle of the parking lot were detectives, and here we find out that they were indeed police, but not our own: they were another country's Secret Police, seriously discussing with each other the state of progress in their efforts to completely destroy and subjugate the United States.

It only seems droll or amusing. It's actually deadly serious, it was at that time, and it's deadly serious now. Only now it's not the Russians we need to worry about... much.

But tradecraft is tradecraft, and the agents who were in place at the end of the Cold War almost certainly remain, and the station chiefs had fairly large stables of informants and "local talent". Spies never discard a useful asset unless it seems that the asset may turn or be turned. And these assets have to be exercised, and most importantly of all, the station chiefs need to find or make a way to get other people to distract or engage the people who are endlessly searching for the station chiefs.

Station chiefs do not live in fabulous upscale apartments festooned with the latest in special gadgets; that would attract attention and station chiefs do not like attention. So, they live in the most crappy place they can find which is not a violent war-zone of a ghetto. In Montgomery County, that's pretty much Aspen Hill.

I already knew all of this, but it was interesting to hear confirmation from a well-educated man with a degree in history that they'd earned on the GI Bill. Comparable conversations have occurred from time to time and from place to place, but thanks to the InterNet, conversations aren't really necessary. You can find all sorts of useful information online.

And if you want to find useful information online that deals with Aspen Hill, Maryland, mostly you will get it because I am out there with a clipboard, taking notes.

And clearly, I am not the only person who knows this.


The Astute Reader will recall that I say I don't have much ability to read faces. Well, that's somewhat true, but when you have a disability, usually you learn to work to overcome it, or at least to work around it or to work with it.

Some things, I can recognize for what they are. A scowl of racial hatred, well, not hard to recognize on some folks. Some folks, the very dangerous ones, manage to conceal it even from the people who can easily read expressions.

Other things are also not too hard to recognize. I might not quite recognize a look of fear, but shivering and huddling are things I understand. When I see this sort of thing from someone who I just asked for a new business's phone number, I can reasonably suspect that they aren't afraid of me personally -- never seen them before in my life -- they're afraid of what I represent, or what has been represented to them.

Are they afraid of me for being white? I kind of doubt it. Are they afraid because I'm not their usual yuppie or preppie customer? It's possible, but I'm just leaning in the doorway asking if I can have their business telephone number. Are they afraid because they recently were traumatized by a male? Sadly, this also is possible.

But when I get this sort of reaction from almost everyone I encounter in that context and on that day, in those few hours, I start wondering if maybe some station-chief didn't decide that it's time to crank up a little misdirection for their pursuers. Get the "locals" all riled up, and the hunters won't be able to sort out the madness of public agitation from the clues left by escalating operations by the enemies of the USA.

This is the classic "kick the anthill" approach to evading detection. Spy hunters are almost onto you? Start a riot.

So, as mentioned earlier this month, Something's Coming, and I expect it will be Something Big.

So much for my life being as boring as I might like.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Look the Other Way, Kiddies, A Flashback for Grownups

Click here for the early 1980s.

Don't say I didn't warn you.

But with all due respect, put enough make-up on some German and Spanish chickies, and you too will find them Simply Irresistable, especially after they get to dancing.

PSA # 9

I tried and tried to find a video PSA about the dangers of allowing living things to ride in the bed of a pickup truck.

I could not find one.

It's so clearly stupid that nobody has bothered to make a PSA.

If you ride in the bed of a pickup truck, you are probably so stupid that you should die.

It is illegal in all 50 States of the USA, and has been illegal for about 25 years.

Now I am looking for a PSA about riding with your hands outside of your vehicle.

For at least 40 years -- since I started learning to drive -- it has been illegal in the State of Maryland for any person to ride in a motor vehicle with any part of their body outside of the passenger compartment. The only exception is in the case of the driver, and that is allowed only when they are actively signalling a left-turn, a right-turn, deceleration or stopping, or waving another vehicle through an intersection.

I defy anyone to prove me wrong on that last part.

Public Service Announcement #8



Remember, folks: even if everyone else wears seatbelts, the one who doesn't will bounce around.



Allow no person in any vehicle to ride without a seatbelt.

They may think they're safe.

You may be the one to die.

Annunciamento de Servicias Publicos No 1



Por favor, mi disculpas, yo no hablo idioma Espa~ol.

De Espa~na:


Trying to Explain, Because Nobody Seems to "Get It"

Brace yourselves for yet-another meandering and pointlessly self-referential blog posting.

First, noted in passing: Just within one block of me, here even in the so-called "better part of Aspen Hill" *cough cough* there are 3 unoccupied houses. Yet this isn't all due to foreclosure or inability to sell; two of the houses are rental properties that are undergoing renovation after very long-term renters moved elsewhere, presumably to by a house somewhere else, at the market bottom. That would be very sensible, and good timing, on their part. For me, this means that I have to be a little more watchful than usual, keeping an eye out for evidence of squatters, "strippers" (people who break into unoccupied houses to rip out the metal plumbing), and other such criminal activity.

Of course, the criminals hate this sort of watchfulness and of course every criminal in the neighborhood knows damned well that if I'm outside watching, they had best not do crime. In the case of the rental properties, those families and my family go back to the first building of their neighborhood, pretty much. We're not exactly great old friends or anything -- though one of the owners was in Cub Scouts with me about half a gajillion years ago -- but unlike probably the majority of the new neighbors, we have respect for each other.

While some of the houses here are empty, in other houses there appear to be new residents "come to stay", but this is not a cheerful story of family reunions. No, this is a case of people who should never have had loans for mortgages, and who lost the homes they should never have been in, and they are consolidating their income and doubling up with other people who are within an inch of losing their own fraudulently-obtained homes.

So, where we used to have one "we're all related" group of 15 people living in a single-family detached residential home, now we have no less than three families of about 7 people each, all living in one single-family detached residential home.

There are about five such houses within a one block radius of my home. And these are just the ones where the overcrowding is clearly visible as people come and go.

Since one of those rather large groups just moved in, of course I've been watching them a bit. It's not like I'm studying them for purposes of stalking, but when I am sitting out on the porch waiting for time to pass as the sprinklers soak the yard in dry weather, it's impossible for me to fail to notice that all of the "children" in this family are teenage females "of an age" (so to speak), and what with the weather being very hot -- and the household being so poor that they are taking in entire large families and don't seem to be able to afford to run the A/C -- these young women spend most of their time running in and out of the house in very skimpy clothes.

Ordinarily this would be more a subject of interest and not of approbation, were it not for all of the young men running in and out with them. I rather doubt that the young men are "related", other than that they seem to all be Spanish-speaking native-americans, as are the young ladies; if what's going on is actually what I think is going on, it would be both illegal and sinful for persons related by blood to be "dating".

All I really know is that there is much more vehicular traffic at this house, and that a lot of young men are coming and going at all hours.

And this brings the subject of the posting back to Yours Truly. I cannot tell whether these are just young ladies riding in cars with their boyfriends of long standing, or young gals getting dates, or a full-blown bordello with a long list of customers and floozies decorating the porch flashing ass at the street in search of fresh trade.

Most people could tell. I cannot; I'm pretty close to incapable of "reading the signals" that most people use to communicate.


To give a concrete example: Imagine me sitting in a bar. I drink and drink, and sooner or later some gal comes up to me. Imagine that she's everything I could reasonably want, perfectly up to my standards, and possibly far beyond. She and I start talking, and I'm already impressed, and she decides that I'm not criminal, not violent, not "a player", definitely not unintelligent, and not actually "insane" as most people understand the word.

And unless she's pretty specific about it -- as in, takes me by the hand and says "please come home with me" -- I have no idea that anything other than a conversation is taking place.

I like sitting in bars, when I can afford it. I like talking to people, even strangers, in a comfortable situation where I feel like I know the rules. One might actually encounter a novel viewpoint or hear something original or meet someone who's interesting. But for me it doesn't go beyond conversation, and that's not because I would object to it going beyond conversation, but because I don't understand much of anything other than the words. I understand words just fine. Other things simply escape my comprehension.

For example: people keep coming up to me and showing me their teeth. This has always baffled me. When I was a kid, it didn't bother me because it was just something that people always did. Then we moved from New Mexico to Maryland, and for the first time in my life, I was bitten by a dog. It's not as if the dog hadn't warned me; it had been showing me its teeth on several occasions and on this occasion it had been showing me its teeth for about a minute, and when I tried to pet it, it took a snap at me.

How should I have known that it would bite? Not that I thought about it this way at the time, but people always showed me their teeth, and none had yet bitten me in anger.

Most people don't need to be told that when a dog is showing you its teeth, it intends to bite you if given the opportunity. Most people over a certain age just know these things.

I didn't just know. First I learned through sad experience, and then having had to learn through sad experience, I had to study it.


Affect Displays are something I generally don't understand, outside of fairly extreme and simplified cases.

For example, people who run screaming away from you might reasonably be interpreted as expressing a desire to be elsewhere, and due to fright.

People who approach to within a certain distance may reasonably be expected to want something from you, hopefully conversation. I have to balance that with context perceptions, however, with rules that I have been forced to develop.

Example of a rule: Someone walking into my personal space in the context of a bar is most likely someone who wants to talk and it is considered impolite to not acknowledge their presence, so I say hi, how are you, or "how about those 'Skins" or something along that line.

Example of another rule: Someone walking into my personal space on an empty street after "last call" is someone who needs to be watched very carefully, and it is reasonable to presume that their intention is assault and/or robbery. At this point in time, another rule set is unlocked and kept ready for action. That rule set has, without doubt, saved my life on several occasions, and other than mentioning this, I will not discuss it.

But as comprehensive as sets of rules, of protocol, of etiquette, may be, quite frequently I find myself without a rule to apply, and most of the time that is because the situation is ambiguous, and nothing is more ambiguous to me -- with my near-incapacity to comprehend Affect Display -- than telling whether or not someone is "hitting on me" or would perhaps like it if I was hitting on them.

Almost all of my rules for judging other people's intentions -- and thus evaluating an appropriate response -- are based on interpersonal distance. Where does my space begin, and end?

I have found an intentional study of Proxemics to be useful.


Proxemics is the study of set measurable distances between people as they interact.

These are frequently culturally defined. The classic story goes as follows:

An Englishman walks into a medium-sized hotel lobby, and sits down.

A German comes in, and seats himself directly across from the Englishman, and then picks up a magazine and starts reading, pointedly ignoring the Englishman.

A Frenchman comes in, walks over to look at the Englishman, walks across the room to look at the German, walks back to the middle of the room, and then seats himself at roomside about halfway between the Englishman and the German.

An American comes in, takes a look at everyone, waves and says hello, gets no response, and wanders off muttering about "damn rude foreigners".

An Arab comes in, and seats himself next to the German. The German gets up and leaves.

The Arab then sits next to the Englishman, who also gets up and leaves.

The Arab then sits next to the Frenchman, who says, "don't you get the message? Can't you sit somewhere else? Look at all of the room in here, you could have any chair in the place, yet you have to pick that one."

And the Arab leans in close, and in a very quiet and reasonable voice, says, "But this is a public place, can I not sit anywhere?"

These people are all following their own internal set of rules, rules they learned in their own homes and cultures.

If the Englishman was at home, and their door was closed, you should knock before entering, and probably should wait for an invitation.

If the German was at home, if the door is closed, don't even bother knocking. If they wanted company, they'd have left the door open.

The Frenchman would be sitting outside if he wanted company; if the door is closed, it's because nobody is there, he's gone seeking company elsewhere.

I admit to total ignorance about what closed doors mean to, or about, Arabs, or how they might feel about other people's closed doors.

And I admit to being as totally ignorant about whether or not a gal in a bar showing me her healthy sharp teeth and then taking a step towards me is or isn't about to take a bite out of me.

Generally speaking, I don't let them get that close. Nor the men, either.


Autism Spectrum disorders do not always consist of troublesome children who don't seem to notice other people and who rock back and forth. Nor do they all grow up to be like the character in the classic film "Rain Man". It's not so much a single syndrome as it is an actual spectrum. Sometimes it's not even "real" autism, sometimes various brain injuries can cause the appearance of only one or a few of the diagnostic dysfunctions that in aggregate are called "autism" or "autism spectrum".

Nobody much noticed whatever problems I might have had when I was a little kid. I learned to talk on time and learned to read very early. It wasn't reasonable, back in the early 1960s, to seek special help for a child who had no locomotor challenges and who spoke and read above grade level, and who was on grade level or above with math skills. Nobody ever called me a troublemaker, not at first, because my idea of being "bad" was to hide a book in my desk which wasn't a text for the class, and since I was getting 100s on all tests through 3rd grade, nobody cared about that.

Yet as time went on, people got to worrying about a sense of being disconnected, aloof, perhaps eventually to become "antisocial".

Actually, I was so totally baffled by people's actions and my inability to know their reasons, that increasingly I would just rather not be around them. People used to just come up and beat on me, and I never knew why... but more importantly, I never had any warning. It's not that their faces told me nothing, but that whatever was on their faces was nothing I could understand.

I spent years wondering why people were so mean. I still do. But I think it all boils down to them thinking I should react to things in ways they expect, and if the things to which they think I should react are the Affect Displays on their faces, they're just as out of luck as I am.

Now, though, I just have a lot of sets of rules about "appropriate" actions or inactions. And most of those are based in proxemics, or in body language. I have very rigid definitions about how to space myself, and how other people should be analyzed under one set of rules when they are outside of my personal space, under another set of rules when they are hovering in the zone of "conversational space" or "social space", and another set of rules for how to behave when they're inside, or trying to get inside, personal space.


In the martial arts, there is a specific posture called Cat Stance. It's also referred to as a "rear balance" position and as a distribution of mass and moment it is something that cannot fail to be recognized, even by me.

Yet although I can recognize this easily, I am still unable to discern the intentions of anyone falling into it.

My father was a forward-front effective in WWII, with an outfit called the Beach Jumpers, a special unit of the US Navy.

You may thus understand his disappointment in a son who was always getting beat up at school and on the playground. For me, this was pretty much an all day every day sort of thing. All parties concerned were rather tired of this. Fortunately, a local YMCA offered courses in Judo. Our instructor was a very genial and talented fellow from Hawai'i, whose "real job" was in embryology, at NIH. I studied under him for almost 5 years. I even entered a few competitions.

Affect Display ambiguity was never a problem here. The object was, when told to do so by the instructor, to get your opponent onto the ground and then pin them to the mat. I got to be pretty good at this. It's one of those things where sets of rules work very well, and where they teach you "don't telegraph your intentions" with either face or variations in posture. That one thing meant that I was no more disabled than anyone. The whole affair became, not an exercise in "what does their face show they think/feel" and more an exercise in "what is their body doing, and what rules will apply to counter".

Later, when I got to the age where Judo starts to rely on choke-holds and other potentially very damaging submission grips, my studies were directed more into Tae Kwon Do. Judo, among other things, is a close-quarters and grappling discipline. Karate and Tae Kwon Do are "stand-off" disciplines; they are designed to keep people at, or beyond, arms-length.

For about 4 years, I studied mostly under Jim Roberts, Jr, at the Rockville studio of the world-reknowned Kim Ki Whang. The grandmaster made such an impression on me, as on so very many others, that I wrote him a WikiPedia Tribute Page.

I should add in passing that my inability to read emotions or intentions from faces never put me at a disadvantage in dealing with Koreans. For one thing, there has to be an expression to read, to read an expression. For another thing, we were taught early on that you don't pay attention to possible deceptions of the face. What is on people's faces is not important; what the rest of the body is doing is what is important. People don't beat you with their faces, and you shouldn't let other people use what is on your face to determine whether or not they may or should attack you.

What you use to determine your own course of action is the posture, the position, the pose, of the people around you.

As for poses, I never did quite figure that out any more than I could learn to read faces in other than an abstract and academic way.

But I did learn for a fact that when someone drops into Cat Stance and puts their foot under your nose, you must either move away, move around, or move inside, and if you move inside, you have to move faster than that foot can come off of the ground.

After four years under Grandmasters Kim and Roberts, as well as other instructors, believe me, I know what to do when someone sticks their foot under my nose. I was trained to respond automatically to that foot plopping down in either an initial position for a front kick or as a pivot anchor for forward moving or horizontal plane kicks from the rear leg.

But for me, everything is context, context is everything.

In the world outside of the studio, how should I react to a display that I was taught for years was the most hostile act a person could make outside of drawing a weapon?


So, frequently I find myself in circumstances which are, to me, very strange, very ambiguous, not really comprehensible, outside of context.

A bar is context. If I'm having a beer and somone -- male or female -- talks to me, I talk back.

Please understand, that because I can read very few emotions from people's faces -- aside from color-based indications such as white with hatred or red with rage -- I have little idea whether someone is trying to be friendly, trying to be really friendly, or just fronting me up while someone else picks my pocket.

It isn't that I cannot communicate, nor be communicated with; the Astute Reader is -- one presumes -- reading this, and should have understood from their understanding that I don't just communicate, I want to communicate, I'm practically obsessed with communication and do so compulsively.

But I am not going to be happy in any crowded space, in the same way that many Deaf people are not happy in any crowded space where they are the only Deaf person. Nobody likes to be in a crowd where there is a lot of communication going on that they cannot perceive.


I presume that as societies become more crowded, more and more pressure will mount for people to constantly communicate with Affect Display and that concurrent pressures will mount to be able to very quickly interpret such Affect Display. Anyone who is neither giving Affect Display nor easily interpreting Affect Display will likely increasingly become outside of a society that maintains calm through studied display of Affect.

We see very interesting signposts along that route in the behavior of Urban Japanese, who live in one of the world's most crowded environments. Constant displays of respect are seen everywhere, even to the little bow that is given afterwards by the folks who stuff people into subway trains so that the doors can close. Sure, you just got manhandled, but you also got an immediate apology, and everyone understands that it's all for a good cause.

Some cultures are already headed down different paths. Many crowded-culture Asians smile widely and frequently; very few of them snarl. (A snarl, or the lopsided sneer of contempt, these are expressions I have trained myself to recognize.) The British and the Germans evidently have opted for formalisms and context in crowded areas.

Yet increasing problems are seen here in the States. Some have observed that expressions (or lack thereof) associated with Blunted Affect are more widespread. Blunted Affect, of course, is the scientific term describing a lack of emotional reactivity on the part of an individual. An expression of blunted affect, thus, would be a deadpan and unchanging expression, regardless of circumstances. Nobody's entirely sure of the relationship of this sort of neutral expression overlaying profound emotional damage (blunted affect is strongly associated with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and over-the-top emotional responses such as pathologic Road Rage.

But don't worry about me, folks.

I don't have Blunted Affect --rather the opposite, in fact, I'm really rather emotional -- I have blunted Affect Display, a whole different syndrome.

I care, and care deeply, but I cannot tell from looking at your face if you care, whether that care is a positive of affection or a negative of mistrust. Most people can tell the difference between a smile and a scowl, but outside of really extreme cases of both, all I can see is teeth. (Let's not go into this particularly horrid face I've seen some gals in MoCo bars make, I don't know exactly what that means either.)

As the previous days' series of PSAs and the explanation for them should show, I'm really worried -- as is the editor of the TARGET="pop870fWaPo1">Washington Post -- about the increasing number of people crossing over traffic lane lines Texting While Driving. When you see me with my eyes scanning oncoming traffic, clearly looking into oncoming cars' driver's seats, I'm engaged in Defensive Driving, trying to know in advance whether someone is aware of traffic or lost in their txting. Mostly it's not about you, unless you're one of those people the DHS wants to talk to because they're curious about the exact composition of that weaponized powder you keep flinging out the window of your cars.

Also, I'm trying to train myself to more quickly recognize the expressions on the faces of people who are not professional television/film actors. So, I might be looking at you because I think I might have recognized someone with a happy face, or a sad face, or a face that's paying attention to their talk radio commentator's line of rhetoric. If you're trying to figure out what's on my face, it's not me reacting to anything but either driving conditions or the oppressive heat and humidity, or possibly to the expression I think I may see on your face; my radio was recently stolen so you can be assured I am not reacting to that.

So here I am, alone in a crowd, alone on the road, alone even when a pretty girl is pretty much accepting a date I didn't know I was trying to get. Hey, context, you know, if a girl is talking to you in a bar, she's at least a little interested, but I can't tell. I'm not disinterested, I'm just like a deaf person standing in the middle of the road who can't hear people screaming "look out for that car".

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Why the PSAs

(Updated, typo fix, stet at 2009 August 27 21:10 hours)

I live at a corner with a Four Way Stop Sign.

The reason there's a four-way stop sign there is because it is a busy intersection.

Everyone who has lived here for very long knows it's a busy intersection, one with a four-way stop sign, and they almost always stop for it. Most of them even take their proper turn in good order.

It wasn't always that way.


We moved here from New Mexico when I was 6. To me, it was about the same here as it was where I had been living, leaving aside the profusion of the color green and the humid density of the air. Here we were nearly at sea-level and I was accustomed to a mile of elevation, yet in both homes, here and there, I had lived in a quiet suburbia in the early 1960s.

On perhaps the third day we lived here, mom sent me out to the corner to put mail in the mailbox. I was almost back to the door and then heard a strange and terrible sound, as if someone had dropped a big box full of metal and glass from a great height. I turned around just in time to see the dead motorcyclist land more or less at my feet. I just kind of looked at him, and had no idea what to do; in fact I had no idea what he was, no idea of what I was seeing. The car never stopped. I guess it was a car. My mother came outside, pale as a sheet, and told me to get inside with the same voice that in New Mexico meant you did exactly what you were told or the rattlesnake would get you. It was only two steps to get inside the door. Mom went back outside and started shouting. We had not yet had the phone service connected.

This was only the first time someone died at this intersection when I lived here. For a while, it seems to me, someone was killed, or nearly killed, about once a month.


The local authorities tried a variety of approaches to reduce the level of fatalities.

Since probably the majority of fatalities resulted from people speeding north up Parkland Drive and hitting slow-moving vehicles just starting up from the stop-signs controlling cross-street traffic, they tried moving the stop-signs to halt traffic on Parkland, and letting the cross-street traffic have the right of way. That didn't work very well. People speeding north on Parkland tended to fly over the hill just south of the intersection, and hit their brakes. Like as not, they'd lose control and collide.

Part of the problem, in retrospect, was that there wasn't much traffic and so people often thought that they were almost the only people on the road. Thus, when most people were at work and when the kids were in school was when we got the most and worst wrecks. But as more cars lined the street, as more cars were always visible being operated on the road, the rate of deadly or maiming accidents slowed a lot, and for this I was grateful.

From that very first horrid incident, I knew the procedure. Call the dispatcher and have the fire trucks and ambulance sent out. I have probably called out the ambulances to my corner more than a hundred times in the 45 years I have lived here. Maybe 150. Less and less often, nowadays, praise be.

Part of this is the Four Way Stop Sign. Almost everyone who comes this way knows about the sign, they learned about it from the person who showed them the short-cut.

Part of this is because people mostly speed less, and praise be for that.

Part of this is because of vehicular safety measures that are part of the vehicles themselves, such as air-bags. Part of this is due to seat-belt laws.

And part of this is because I am unfortunately unemployable for most purposes, and because our back porch gives a commanding view of the intersection, and when I see people doing stupid things repeatedly, I go bug the cops to do something about it, and sometimes they do.


These British Public Service Announcements ("PSA") that are so damned shocking to some people are showing things that are shocking to people who have never seen a wreck, have never seen the aftermath, have never had to listen to the screams of people sitting next to the guy who just hit a motorcycle, lost control, impacted a telephone pole, and hit the steering column so hard that they folded the wheel in half and then got impaled on the steering column.

I have seen and heard that and do not want to hear it again. That's not even the worst one.

And I have been a pedestrian hit by a car, not here, and this was my own stupid fault, and I was both very lucky and very durable and also what they call "bouncy drunk". All I got out of it was a broken hand, aching ribs, and (literally) my ass knocked sideways. The hand is healed and the ass is slowly drifting back to where it should be, and the rest of my spine along with it. Yet even as slight as were my injuries compared to what could have happened, I do wish that it won't happen to anyone else, especially not here, not in front of me, not while I'm trying to relax on my porch.


At least once a day, quite frequently as often as once in every hour that I am in sight of the intersection, some clue free fuckwad rolls through that intersection at speed.

Almost invariably, they are yapping on their cellphone, and I almost invariably yell "Asshole! Hang the fuck up and DRIVE!"

It takes a special breed of ignorant dimwit to not just roll through a 4-way stop at speed, but to do it when all three other lanes entering the intersection have vehicles there waiting their turn. And zoom goes the dimwit.


My father was a very good and cautious driver, and he tried to teach me to be the same.

Once, when I had learned to handle the car fairly well for my age, he pointed out that the most important thing is not how you are driving, but how the other drivers are driving.

Long before anyone had coined the phrase "Defensive Driving", my dad was sloganeering with "Look alive and stay alive".

You cannot, by any objective standard, suggest that you can "look alive" when you're trying to decode txt on a tiny screen. Given the number of people I see rolling through the stop sign, lots of people can't "look alive" while holding a cellphone to their ear.


Lately, something really bothersome has been getting on my last nerves.

People in my neighborhood like to engage in the Maryland State Sport, which is walking.

They walk to work, they walk to the bus-stop (one is at the 4-way stop), they walk home from the stores, they walk their dogs, they walk around the block with their life-partner or their sweetie.

And what I have seen almost once a day is a pedestrian almost hit while using the crosswalk at a 4-way stop.

People actually wait for their turn in good order, and then make their turn or proceed across, even when there is a pedestrian in the cross walk in front of them.

I have almost been hit, and that's very hard to do as I am exceptionally paranoid about traffic here, and have been since I was a mere child of six and a dead man fell out of the sky (as it seemed at the time).

My mother had almost been hit, by some asshole that rolled through without pause, rolling 35 MPH or so, and texting as they drove.

I have seen ladies walking their dogs almost get hit, and when they said something like "I'm walking here", the transgressor just gave them the finger and said something I couldn't understand.

I have seen comparable people actually have to hit the vehicle or push away from it to avoid being squashed.

Probably the majority of the times I have seen someone almost get hit, the driver of the vehicle was talking on the cellphone.

I have the theory that a lot of people are driving around "in the zone" in any case, and that the cellphone only adds to the distraction. Add to this the intellectual strain many people seem to experience at 4-way stops, and their brain simply cannot handle the idea that pedestrians have the right of way in Maryland crosswalks.

Having seen at least one vehicle per hour (any hour I sit out there, I see one such vehicle, understand?) run the stop sign, and watching almost every single pedestrian trying to navigate that intersection at rush-hour get almost hit, or even suffer "brush-by" minor hits, I believe that it's only a matter of time until I'm back in the bad old days, days I thought had finally ended, where once again I will be calling for the ambulance, as I listen to screaming and watch the blood gush.

And hence the PSAs full of horrid death due to totally preventable stupidity:

So that you can watch, in a way you may stop, what I will have to watch and deal with in real life.

Or maybe people will start realizing that people's lives are more important than their fucking txt messages.

Public Service Announcement #7



You might not care about your own life, but how will your friends feel?




Public Service Announcement #6



School's back in session.


Public Service Annoucement #5



Perhaps it might be best if you weren't in such a goddamn hurry.



PSA #4



It's 30 KPH for a reason.


PSA #3



When it comes to cellphones and driving, the British are far more sensible than Americans, don't you think? Not the least bit shy about confronting the truth in their Public Service Announcements.


Public Service Announcement #2



Cellphones do seem to cause problems, don't they.


Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Notes on Public Service Announcement #1

Anyone who sees this PSA and doesn't immediately confiscate all texting cellphones from people they claim to love, should immediately be considered a thoughtless sociopath, dragged from whatever they are doing, and be horsewhipped within an inch of their life.

There is simply no excuse for involving, in driving, a technology that makes you drive two dozen times more badly than when you are beyond the legal limit of completely too fucking drunk to drive.

Anyone failing to remove a cellphone from a driver texting ought to be locked up as intentional accessory to negligent homicide. I suggest a minimum sentence of 15 years, as that is the average age of the person killed by texting-while-driving, and the average age of their victim.

There's no excuse.

If you see a person texting while driving, immediately beat the living shit out of them. Disable their vehicle if necessary so that you may properly work them over with a tire-iron. If they don't like it, firebomb their lawyer and then take it home to them: you text while driving and you are 50,000 times more dangerous than a rabid pit-bull locked into a bedroom with a person tied hand and foot. There's simply no excuse for allowing someone 15,000 times more dangerous than the war in Iraq to run free on the streets negligently aiming to kill your children.

If there is a public enemy in the USA, it's people who are texting while driving. Either they stop and stop right now, or you incapacitate them as a clear and present danger. If they won't stop, kill them before they kill your children... even though the majority of texters-while-driving are your children's friends... who are about 200,000 times more likely than anyone else -- these texters-while-driving who are driving your children around -- to kiil your children... to kill their best friends.

That's all, folks.

Texting while driving?

Nothing will do but a good old-fashioned Maryland Tire Iron Party.

Last thing you break is the cellphone... in the hand of the asshole who was texting with it while driving a car.

20 or 30 extra whacks might get the point across.

And no, I am not a sociopath... I just know what it takes to carry a message across to them.

Nothing less than a Maryland Tire Iron Party will convey the message.

Nothing less than a Maryland Tire Iron Party can make your children safe from this.

Ya know, because all very few of us who remain sane here know how Marylanders are: Then again, if it wasn't as likely to kill our children as the children of Them, we'd cheerfully let them go ahead and do suicidal stupidity while driving. But as it is the children of the sane who are most at risk of this madness, it's Maryland Tire Iron Party time.

Party hearty. And Party On.

Public Service Announcement #1



This is intended for children. Make them watch, please.




Saturday, August 22, 2009

Signs On the Lawn

In case anyone is reading this to try to figure out why there are signs on my lawn -- and not incidentally what's going on with Sligo Golf Course, which is what the signs are about -- they should just go read the site of Sligo Creek Golf Association.

Do I golf? Never have. Why should I care? Because other people care.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Trash Day at the Hardman House: No Rats Here!

First, the Washington Post more or less confirms but clarifies what I have been predicting. Keep in mind that the Truly Astute Reader already knows that I am always right, you just might not know that yet.

Troubled Mortgages Hit Record High: Problem Shifts From Subprime Loans to Jobless Homeowners (Merle, Renae, Washington Post, August 21, 2009) covers the fact that "[t]he proportion of homeowners delinquent on their mortgage or in foreclosure rose to its highest levels in at least four decades," and that furthermore, "[t]he problem has shifted from the subprime loans that helped spark the foreclosure crisis to borrowers driven into delinquency by unemployment".

And now for something completely different.


Like anyone who reads history, I just plain hate rats.

I don't just loathe them because they're furry little quadrupeds who actually aren't all that little. I don't even loathe them for being rats; actually, with all due precautions taken, they make great pets.





As the lady points out, once they get used to you, they will come right to you, because you're the one who feeds them.

Rats were supposedly a common pet back in the middle ages, even the poor could afford to have a pet rat. In the middle ages, through most of the world, the rich and poor alike were infested with fleas, and of course, the rats themselves were infested with fleas.

Unfortunately, the fleas themselves sometimes got infested, with a bacterium known as pasteurella pestis or yersina pestis. While this might not have bothered the fleas all that much, when the fleas bite human beings, the result is Plague.





And this is why I loathe rats: a timid and really rather friendly semi-domesticated animal unfortunately carried a disease that is believed to have killed half of Europe.

In the modern day, Plague is generally easily treated with antibiotics. It's even endemic in rodents in the western US, though fortunately the fleas that infest those ground-squirrels generally don't like to bite humans, and as the ground-squirrels are very wild and don't like humans, the fleas with Plague tend to die before transmitting the disease to humans. Yet many a scientist and public-health official has lost more than a few nights of sleep wondering what could happen if the fleas of the man-fearing ground-squirrels became widespread in the man-loving rats of the big cities.


Trash Day at the Hardman House doubtless causes a little bit of confusion for the guys who pick up the trash and recycling.

The guys who pick up the trash may somewhat marvel at the prodigious number of beer cans and figure that there must be a lot of serious partying going on at this house. But why, then, is there so little trash in the big garbage can?

The ratio of trash-to-recycle is very high here, on the recycle end of things. As for me, I tend to eat out of cans, as cans store well and are immune to destruction in the unfortunately frequent and often long-lasting electrical power outages we have here. Also, metal is very easily and efficiently recycled. Furthermore, rodents can't chew through it.

Plastic and paper fill the recycle bins, as well as metal. I was an early-adopter of recycling and I don't mind taking a little extra time to help preserve the energy and materials resources of the planet.

There's almost no garbage because I tend to eat small servings, and I eat all of those small servings. I don't ever have food go bad, and I never throw out food. The only perishable/organic wastes I have that could go into the garbage are vegetable husks or rinds, and I don't usually throw those out. We accumulate them under refrigeration until there's enough to take out and mash into the compost. The compost is later spread around the yard where it makes our gardens grow quite well, thanks.

What makes it into the garbage can? Not much. Maybe some peach pits, or non-recyclable plastics such as candy wrappers or that sort of thing.

As a family, we learned much of this when we lived out west, and vacationed in places like Colorado or Wyoming, and back in the 1960s, this was still very wild country, with abundant bear and coyote. If you went to Yellowstone, you had better secure your garbage no less than your food, or you would attract bear, and you definitely don't want to attract hungry bears.

The same techniques that worked to keep from feeding the bears will work to keep from feeding the rats.

If you don't feed them, they will not come.

Rats, generally speaking, aren't as well-equipped to rip open your plastic garbage can as would be a bear. Just put the top on tightly and you won't be feeding the rats.

Clean your cans before putting them in the recycle bin. That way, there's nothing for the rats, and also nothing for flies and other insects.

Don't store anything outside that rats can eat, unless you store it in a metal can. This includes things such as seed for bird feeders.


Due to last fall's complete failure of the acorn crop, I spend all of the winter and most of the spring spreading a lot of "patio mix" seed and nuts around the yard. This made me very popular with assorted birds and squirrels, not to mention the damned deer.

The scene became somewhat comical as smaller birds would land on the bird feeder, select their preferred brand of seed or nut, and knock many of the non-preferred variety of seeds or nuts to the ground. The squirrels would just sit below the feeder and as nuts landed, they ate them. At the end of the day, when the squirrels were stuffed and were up in some tree sleeping off their meal, mourning-doves strutted around picking up all of the small seed that no other animals or birds would eat. After dark, the damned deer would come around and just stand there, licking the remainder of the food out of the bird-feeder.

Yet along about May, I stopped feeding the animals, because one morning I saw a rather large Rat charge out from under a bush, trying to drive squirrels aways from some nuts knocked to the ground by the finches.

It was summer, in any case, by then. There was plenty of other food for the wildlife to enjoy, and I see no excuse whatsoever to feed rats. I also see no excuse whatsoever for anyone else to be feeding the rats.


I'm hearing from a lot of my neighbors that there is an increasing rat infestation problem here.

Evidently, certain people are showing their ignorance by overstuffing their trash cans, and not covering those trash cans.

Of course, all they are doing is providing abundant and accessible free food for rats.

Ordinarily, this would be a self-correcting problem; the people feeding the rats would eventually suffer diseases carried by the rats they encourage.

However, what happens here is that they are preventing rat starvation, and feeding rats once a week in one place, and on the next day, rats are being fed on neighboring blocks, etc. Eventually rats catch on to the routine and will simply migrate from block to block on schedule with trash-day. This may exclude nursing females, of which there are many fat and plenty, to judge by the rate at which poison baits are being consumed as fast as they are set out.

So, thanks to the wonders of google translation, I must make a public service announcement to the people who are overflowing their trash cans with plastic bags, providing abundant food for rats:

Por favor, cierre su contenedor de basura. O bien, muchas ratas vendrán a enfermar a su bebé.